Science vs. regulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-06 14:30 (3239 d 11:40 ago) – Posting: # 10161
Views: 21,033

Dear Ratnakar,

EMA’s opinion [sic] that AUCt is a reliable estimate of extent of absorption only if AUCt ≥ 80% of AUC is scientifically questionable if (!) IR formulations are concerned (absorption practically completed at 2–4× tmax). Therefore, we need more information.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,829 posts in 4,566 threads, 1,555 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 02:11 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The generation of random numbers is too important
to be left to chance.    Robert R. Coveyou

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5