Science vs. regulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-06 14:30 (3397 d 21:12 ago) – Posting: # 10161
Views: 21,756

Dear Ratnakar,

EMA’s opinion [sic] that AUCt is a reliable estimate of extent of absorption only if AUCt ≥ 80% of AUC is scientifically questionable if (!) IR formulations are concerned (absorption practically completed at 2–4× tmax). Therefore, we need more information.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,165 posts in 4,645 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 12:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Absolute certainty is a privilege of uneducated minds  and fanatics.
It is, for scientific folk, an unattainable ideal.    Cassius J. Keyser

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5