Sampling (optimization?) [Design Issues]

posted by intuitivepharma – India, 2013-03-01 08:42 (4842 d 20:19 ago) – Posting: # 10138
Views: 13,041

(edited on 2013-03-01 08:52)

Dear Helmut,

Many thanks for the Excel workout and valuable info on “partial derivatives plot”.

On a second thought, can I tweak the algorithm to generate geometric progression such that the sampling is closer towards the last time point. Consider I have 18 sampling time points till 36 hours and the Cmax for my formulation is around 4 hours. I can split them in to two sets.
  1. 9 sampling time points pre Tmax
  2. 9 sampling time points post Tmax
I will use the existing above described algorithm for post Tmax sampling time generation [5.0, 7.0, 9.0, 12.0, 16.0, 20.0, 28.0 and 36 hrs – time points optimised for practicability].

For pre Tmax sampling time points I will use the algorithm that generates time points in a geometric progression that are closer towards the last time point [i.e. actually the Tmax].

After this exercise, if the 18 sampling time point thus generated are put together, we will have a sampling schedule which is crowded towards the Tmax [ideal] and spacing out in a geometric progression on either sides.

❝ To keep it simple I would set the sampling interval to multiples of 15 minutes. We should have at least three sampling time points in the absorption phase and around Cmax (FDA). So I suggest to aim for five evenly spaced samples in the interval [0, 4.75] ⇒ [0, 0.95, 1.9, 2.85, 3.8, 4.75] ⇒ mround(t,0.25) ⇒ [0, 1, 2, 2.75, 3.75, 4.75]. The remaining ten sample geometrically spaced, rounded ⇒ [6.5, 8.75, 11.75, 16, 21.5, 29, 39.25, 53.25, 72].


I totally agree with you but, just wanted to play around a bit with the algorithm. May come in handy for ER products with Tmax around 12 hours having a zero order release/absorption profile. I tried my bit with tweaking the excel algorithm but only ended up with failure :confused:.


Thanks,
IP.

Thanks & Regards,
IP.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
391 visitors (0 registered, 391 guests [including 25 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5