Diagnostics [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2007-08-21 21:18 (6881 d 10:56 ago) – Posting: # 1004
Views: 7,479

Dear drgopal,

❝ Can we have a separate acceptable range on our own (+/- 10-15% of the range) as our company's range beside the reference range?


In addition to Helmut's response: if you were to adopt such a system you would need to discuss the extended range on a parameter-by parameter basis, not just extend everything by 10 %. This would be OK for e.g. SGOT - 44 IU/l instead of 40 is no big deal, if the elevation is isolated. But take sodium, with normal ranges of 135-145 mmol/l. Extending the range to 122-159 would definitively not be acceptable ! And once again you can't interpret each parameter separately, you also have to look at the complete picture. And this is the investigator's job, not an SOP's.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
125 visitors (0 registered, 125 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5