Statistical Issue (significant Formulation, Period and seq.) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Imran  – Mumbai, 2007-04-20 09:22 (6596 d 17:43 ago) – Posting: # 677
Views: 14,203

Dear sir/Madam

In Bioequivalence study, if formulation (Treatment) effect is significant (since ANOVA p-value is less than 0.05) for both Cmax and AUC and individually for Cmax or AUC, what we can conclude from this significant formulation effect. Similarly, what we can conclude from period and sequence significant effect.
In case of significant formulation effect is that mean number of subject used in the study were more than required.

Regards,

Imran

P.S.
In a statistical analysis of BA/BE data, many time we come across sequence, formulation and period effect in ANOVA (p <0.05). what conclusion should one draw from such data? what would be reason for such effects?


Edit: P.S. attached from new post by Imran of 2007-05-07 15:00 [HS]

Dr.Imran Khan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
146 visitors (0 registered, 146 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5