Half life longer than literature (or well known) half-life [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2023-12-06 05:19 (920 d 03:42 ago) – Posting: # 23780
Views: 6,390

Hi all,

I have a question. What if my NCA calculated half-life of a drug is significantly longer than the literature reported half-life which is well established (and I have old study data to back up the literature half-life as well). The newly calculated half-life is longer because I sampled longer than usual and the bioanalytical method has a much lower BLQ. Note that the elimination phase also has a biphasic appearance. Since the data is the data, I assume there is nothing that I would need to do other than writing something to discuss why the my calculated half-life is longer?

FYI, i just let Phoenix to pick the timepoints itself to calculate the half-life. Of course I can override and select the timepoint as well but then the R2 might not be optimal.

Thx

Jag

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
113 visitors (0 registered, 113 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5