Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products

EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products [BE/BA News]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2012-03-06 20:09 (5227 d 07:18 ago) – Posting: # 8222
Views: 28,226

Hi HS,

I can follow the logic, although I could be a little afraid that the innovator industry as a means of brand protection could start building IP protection around the cut-offs (or other). It would be tremendously effective if granted.

What's your own take on this?

—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products Helmut 2012-03-06 15:23
- EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR productsElMaestro 2012-03-06 19:09
  - EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products Helmut 2012-03-07 03:52
    - EMA: Q&A on biphasic MR products ElMaestro 2012-03-07 19:20
- EMA vs. FDA d_labes 2012-03-07 10:26
  - MPH examples Helmut 2012-03-07 14:22
    - MPH examples d_labes 2012-03-07 16:18
      - MPH examples Helmut 2012-03-08 01:07
        
        FDA more straight? d_labes 2012-03-08 08:29
        
        and what about power? ElMaestro 2012-03-08 11:37
        
        and what about power? d_labes 2012-03-08 13:26
        and what about power? Helmut 2012-03-08 13:36
        
        FDA more straight? Helmut 2012-03-08 12:51
        
        FDA more straight? luvblooms 2012-03-09 06:55
        
        Multiphasic MR ≠ DR Helmut 2012-03-09 12:18
        
        Multiphasic MR ≠ DR jag009 2012-03-28 15:29
        
        Metadate CD (30/70) Helmut 2012-03-28 15:45