‘Percentage covered’ [BE/BA News]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-08-06 00:13 (667 d 03:15 ago) – Posting: # 24137
Views: 16,144

Hi Mittyri,

❝ ICH group was copying many things from EMA BE Guideline (and this is good).



❝ But what prompted the ICH group to replace the Residual Area term with Ratio? Was there some kind of dissatisfaction with the 80% coverage criterion and the ambiguity surrounding Residual Area? :-D

Not the slightest idea. I know a few members of the group and can ask. Answer not guaranteed. ;-)


Edit 1: Perhaps the members were not familiar with what is given in the output of PK software (Phoenix WinNonlin, PKanalix, PKNCA ([image]), ncappc ([image]), NonCompart ([image]), ncar ([image])Pumas (Julia), …):

AUClast, AUCINF_obs, AUCINF_pred, AUC_%Extrap_obs, AUC_%Extrap_pred or similar


Since the ‘percentage covered’ (\(\small{100\times AUC_{{0-}\text{t}}/AUC_{0-\infty}}\)) is not part of the output, we have to set up any of these transformations (terminology used by the first three goodies above):Until software is updated to automatically provide something like AUC_%Covered_obs and AUC_%Covered_pred we have to live with it.

An example of the setup in Phoe­nix Win­Non­lin (at the bottom the User Defined Parameters and on top the last lines of the Core output):
[image]
Output Data FinalFinal Parameters Pivoted (last columns)
[image]
Table after some transformations and cosmetics:
[image]



Edit 2: I realized that the guideline does not require a breakdown by treatment but »… 20% of the observations …« Therefore:

[image]


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
276 visitors (0 registered, 276 guests [including 39 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5