Not estimable in the model [BE/BA News]

posted by The user – Russia, 2017-03-14 13:13 (3368 d 17:10 ago) – Posting: # 17154
Views: 36,915

❝ Try a type I model with Group before Subjects, then you'll get something that is estimable, I believe.


Thank you for your reply.

Sorry, but I did not catch the idea. Should I try this model: Group+Patient(Sequence)+Sequence+Period+Treatment?

One more comment: the groups are unbalanced. Type I is suiatable for balanced groups as I undertood. Looks like I could not use the Type I model.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
521 visitors (0 registered, 521 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5