Total drug in BE (and mainly in BA) [Off Topic]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-04-08 21:43 (5917 d 06:26 ago) – Posting: # 5050
Views: 5,806

Dear Ricardo!

❝ Does bioavailability measure the amount of total drug at a given time or only measure the amount of unbound drug?


Since you are mentioning bound/unbound drug, I guess you are talking about plasma/serum. Biovailability is defined as a concentration [mass/volume], not an amount [mass]. OK, in urine we have amounts. ;-)

It's important to differentiate between bioavailability and bioequivalence. In developing a new drug protein binding is assessed by suitable methods (dialysis, ultracentifugation,…) in order to discover potential problems (e.g., PK interactions due to competitive binding). Mainly these studies are performed in vitro. Even in early development most PK studies (absolute PK, dose proportionality, etc.) are measuring total drug only. I have seen just a few in vivo studies, where samples were measured twice (conventional sample preparation and after dialysis). Apart from the technical problems, sensitivity issues arise. If a drug is to 99 % bound to proteins, the analytical method must be 100× more sensitive (see this post).

In bioequivalence always total drug is measured. The rationale behind: In BE we are interested in differences between formulations (i.e., everything which may influence liberation, in vivo dissolution, and absorption). Once the drug reaches the systemic circulation (becomes bioavailable), the drug-specific ratio bound/unbound can't be influenced by the formulation any more.
Theoretically an exotic excipient - contained in different amounts in the formulations and getting absorbed itself - may force the API from the protein. In such a case the total concentrations will be the same, but the free fraction will be different. There were some discussions about this topic in the past (example: valproic acid - narrow therapeutic index, saturable protein binding). Though it may be an issue when it comes to PK interactions, formulations are so similar when it comes to biopharmaceutics and no evidence of problems were reported in clinical practice, this topic was ‘closed’ by consenus.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
120 visitors (0 registered, 120 guests [including 37 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5