Big Pharma strikes back with data secrecy [Off Topic]

posted by Relaxation  – Germany, 2019-10-28 15:56 (2078 d 02:18 ago) – Posting: # 20728
Views: 5,235

Hi mittyri.

❝ If [...] general presumption of confidentiality, it would change the rules of the game.


Ah, well. Thinking back, how long it took to get to this point, and that there already was a lot of populism and lobbyism (from al sides, including the "patients") I am not concerned that there will be a rapid change back.

❝ See here


Sorry, but this is behind a pay-wall? Only 5 first lines available? Is it possible to see that elsewhere?

Best regards,
Relaxation.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5