Rotten or not rotten ? [Off Topic]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2016-02-27 15:00 (3759 d 03:35 ago) – Posting: # 16037
Views: 48,409

(edited on 2016-02-27 16:33)

Dear Nobody,

❝ The story would be more impressing if the data were available. I don't buy this without all the data, sorry.


I'd love to see a full picture too. Unfortunately Bial are not willing to see the data made public. At least they were shared with the other EU agencies and the FDA.

But I'm not impressed either by an article by a non-specialised journalist, in an opposition newspaper, trying to make a lot of fuss and pretending to see a scandal in something which is actually expected, in order to criticise the Minister of Health from the opposite party and the director of the French Agency appointed by her.

❝ This stinks. Errors have been made. What we see now is the usual cover-up.


Could be. I dunno. But political manoeuvres yes, very likely.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
112 visitors (0 registered, 112 guests [including 42 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5