Rotten or not rotten ? [Off Topic]

posted by nobody – 2016-02-27 11:56 (3759 d 11:35 ago) – Posting: # 16036
Views: 48,478

The story would be more impressing if the data were available. I don't buy this without all the data, sorry. It is very interesting to read in one of the early press releases that everything was OK with the approval/oversight of this trial.

While everybody in this field who has done first in man simply shakes head about such toxicity not found in the preclinical assessment. If that was really the case then we have a black swan here and then it would be absolutely crucial to make all data available in the public domain.

This stinks. Errors have been made. What we see now is the usual cover-up.

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
125 visitors (0 registered, 125 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5