Rotten or not rotten ? [Off Topic]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2016-02-27 06:49 (3760 d 16:07 ago) – Posting: # 16034
Views: 48,418

(edited on 2016-02-27 07:47)

Dear Nobody,

❝ This stinks.


IMHO what would stink would be not to have any dog die during the preclinical studies. It would mean that either the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, or some data were masked.

According to information since published in the French press, these dogs received 100 mg/kg/day during 3 months (i.e. about 1500 mg/day). The subject who died got 50 mg/day over 5 days. None of the dogs had neurological problems of the same type as the 5 subjects.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
115 visitors (0 registered, 115 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have never in my life learned anything
from any man who agreed with me.    Dudley Field Malone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5