Phase I, I/IV, or what? [Off Topic]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-10-16 19:18 (4261 d 15:48 ago) – Posting: # 13729
Views: 7,156

Hi Lucas,

❝ IMHO if I had to classify BE in one of these 4 classes, I would say it is in “phase III” (for this is the phase in which comparative studies are made), specifically in terms of therapeutic equivalence.


Phase III is done in patients (endpoints efficacy & safety), whereas BE mainly employs healthy subjects. If have seen many wordings in protocols. Some state Phase I (PK in healthy subjects), some I/IV (I for the test and IV for the reference), and some elegantly circumnavigate all terminology issues and state just “human pharmacology”. Pick whatever you like. You will not loose the war by using a “wrong” term.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
140 visitors (0 registered, 140 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5