Phase I, I/IV, or what? [Off Topic]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-10-16 19:18 (4272 d 04:20 ago) – Posting: # 13729
Views: 7,197

Hi Lucas,

❝ IMHO if I had to classify BE in one of these 4 classes, I would say it is in “phase III” (for this is the phase in which comparative studies are made), specifically in terms of therapeutic equivalence.


Phase III is done in patients (endpoints efficacy & safety), whereas BE mainly employs healthy subjects. If have seen many wordings in protocols. Some state Phase I (PK in healthy subjects), some I/IV (I for the test and IV for the reference), and some elegantly circumnavigate all terminology issues and state just “human pharmacology”. Pick whatever you like. You will not loose the war by using a “wrong” term.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
335 visitors (0 registered, 335 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5