Period effect [Off Topic]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2014-01-28 11:36 (4098 d 22:45 ago) – Posting: # 12281
Views: 13,824

Dear kumarnaidu
That's interesting. Why is the bioavailability much better in period 1 than in period 2 for both, test and reference? Systematic error? Artefact? What was the number of subjects and what was the CVintra?
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,699 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully
considered what they do not say.    William W. Watt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5