Period effect [Off Topic]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2014-01-28 11:36 (4533 d 11:53 ago) – Posting: # 12281
Views: 16,925

Dear kumarnaidu
That's interesting. Why is the bioavailability much better in period 1 than in period 2 for both, test and reference? Systematic error? Artefact? What was the number of subjects and what was the CVintra?
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
359 visitors (0 registered, 359 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5