Experiences with EU submissions [Bioanalytics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-01-10 21:07 (4917 d 04:49 ago) – Posting: # 9820
Views: 8,971

Thanks Helmut,

Do you consider 1ng/mL LLoQ sufficient with the current state of art equipments? I think it's too high (Sciex 5500+ can do better).

With the drug I am working with, based on pilot data, will be like 120 ng/mL for Cmax (the highest Cmax, the study was 200 mg so assuming 2x200mg). The range now is 1ng/mL - 200 ng/mL. I think I can push down the ULoQ to 100 ng/mL and do dilution for higher conc samples.

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
285 visitors (0 registered, 285 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5