90% CI riddle [Bioanalytics]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2012-12-20 13:58 (4542 d 18:26 ago) – Posting: # 9737
Views: 8,295

Dear Outlaw
we currently have the problem that a BE study was accepted in a DCP procedure a while ago and now in a repeat use procedure (=new application!) the study is rejected. As you said, it only takes one stubborn (French) assessor to stick to the ISR requirement and you're screwed.
I agree with you, the Q&A document raises more questions than it lays to rest.
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
79 visitors (0 registered, 79 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s difficult to work in a group
when you are omnipotent.    John de Lancie (as Q)

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5