Duplicate LLOQ and ULOQ [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-01-20 14:09 (4884 d 12:09 ago) – Posting: # 7980
Views: 5,111

Dear Ohlbe!

❝ What most people do is that they only use one of the two replicates of the LLOQ and ULOQ samples. Usually the first replicate is used,…


Really most people? That’s strange to me. Why the first and not the second? Why not both?

❝ Some people take whichever value gives the highest R2, but I don't like that (I don't consider R2 to be a relevant parameter).


Right. R² is meaningless in calibration (if you prefer the statistical term: inverse regression). A nice reference (based on backcalculated concentrations):

Almeida AM, Castel-Branco MM, and AC Falcão
Linear regression for calibration lines revisited: weighting schemes for bioanalytical methods
Journal of Chromatography B 774, 215–22 (2002)


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,678 registered users;
36 visitors (0 registered, 36 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No rational argument will have a rational effect on a man
who does not want to adopt a rational attitude.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5