PTT vs. SPE method [Bioanalytics]

posted by paulhurleyuk – NE UK, 2011-12-08 11:05 (5315 d 23:46 ago) – Posting: # 7766
Views: 3,524

Neither is 'better' than the other, they're two different extraction methods that each have their own upsides and downsides.

PPT – Protein Precipitation, where an excess of some reagent (often organic solvent such as acetonitrile) is added that causes the proteins in the sample to denature and precipitate out, where they can be filtered or spun down to give the rest of the sample. Pros; Cheap, Quick and Simple, Cons; Still gives a fairly dirty sample, can result in ion suppression.

SPE – Solid Phase Extraction, where the sample is added to a solid extraction column (such as C18 silica) and then unwanted compounds washed away, before the wanted analytes are eluted, then usualy dried down, reconstituted in a suitable injection solvent. Pros; Gives cleaner sample, Cons; Takes longer, can loose material during dry down step, method dev takes longer, more expensive

Check out;
Gilar, M., Bouvier, E. S. P., & Compton, B. J. 2001, "Advances in sample preparation in electromigration, chromatographic and mass spectrometric separation methods", Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 909, no. 2, pp. 111-135.

McDowall, R. D. 1989, "Sample preparation for biomedical analysis", Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, vol. 492, pp. 3-58.

Xu, R. N., Fan, L., Rieser, M. J., & El Shourbagy, T. A. 2007, "Recent advances in high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC-MS/MS", Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 342-355.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
202 visitors (0 registered, 202 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5