Different make of instrument [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2011-06-29 12:06 (5471 d 16:36 ago) – Posting: # 7186
Views: 3,120

Dear Auditor,

❝ My understanding is to perform at least three P&A, matrix effect and selectivity/ sensitivity on other (API) instrument to justify the conduction of study.


Agreed. Basically I would repeat the whole validation except stability experiments (and recovery, if you have it as part of your validation).

❝ Kindly suggest the correct practice and give if there is any reference on the above mentioned case.


No reference that I know of. The FDA guidance is extremely vague on partial validation (just says it can be anything from a single run for precision and accuracy to an almost full validation). But you should be able to justify scientifically what experiments need, and do not need, to be repeated. Matrix effects, selectivity and LLOQ do depend on the instrument you are using.

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
142 visitors (0 registered, 142 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5