Anticoagulant [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2011-06-01 14:04 (5502 d 03:15 ago) – Posting: # 7050
Views: 7,405

Dear Dan,

What I have seen or heard of several times is studies where the validation had been done with CPDA, standard/QC samples in the study were also prepared with CPDA plasma, but subject samples were taken on EDTA or heparin. Observation during the sample analysis: two-fold difference in IS response between the two anticoagulants. Investigations: difference in matrix effects, not corrected by the internal standard. Consequence: all concentrations were inaccurate.

I don't think regulators would accept the fact that the concentrations are just as inaccurate for the test as for the reference as an excuse for a lousy method... The problem is also that in my experience the difference in IS response and therefore the level of inaccuracy varies from run to run.

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
119 visitors (0 registered, 119 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5