variation in response of the analyte and internal standard [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2011-01-16 00:09 (5643 d 14:00 ago) – Posting: # 6422
Views: 5,675

Dear Hale,

❝ Also; validation was completed and this problem is occured in study so, I

❝ cannot change any of my conditions/solutions/pH.


Well... If you have problems with the method during the study, you will have to change something in the method and this may require a re-validation !

❝ By the way; I think this problem leads to ionization problem. What can you

❝ think about changing desolvation temperature and desolvation gas flow?


Yes, you can try and see if it helps. Possibly also other ionisation parameters such as cone voltage / declustering potential or whatever it is called on your instrument.

❝ And if I change desolvation temperature and/or desolvation gas flow, do I

❝ have to perform whole validation once more?


Well, if it affects the ionisation significantly enough to solve your problem... Almost full validation, yes. You don't have to study stabilities again, but obviously you will have to go for matrix effects, and I would say you will also need to re-demonstrate LLOQ, precision and accuracy...

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
288 visitors (0 registered, 288 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5