Log in
RegisterRejection of passed data [Bioanalytics]
Dear Shastris,
It is acceptable if you indeed have a real, objective and well documented reason. Of course it is better to have it prospectively defined in an SOP, but you cannot think of every possible situation in advance and write them in an SOP, and you need to use your scientific judgement too if you think there is a problem with the run.
The results of the failed runs do not need to be reported, but you should list the rejected runs in the report, with the reason for the rejection.
Keep all documentation relating to the rejected runs in your archives with the trial documentation, and particularly those documents showing what the problem was, the decision taken (when and by whom), and any possible corrective or preventative action you may have taken.
Regards
Ohlbe
Post number 5000...
to all! [Helmut]
It is acceptable if you indeed have a real, objective and well documented reason. Of course it is better to have it prospectively defined in an SOP, but you cannot think of every possible situation in advance and write them in an SOP, and you need to use your scientific judgement too if you think there is a problem with the run.
The results of the failed runs do not need to be reported, but you should list the rejected runs in the report, with the reason for the rejection.
Keep all documentation relating to the rejected runs in your archives with the trial documentation, and particularly those documents showing what the problem was, the decision taken (when and by whom), and any possible corrective or preventative action you may have taken.
Regards
Ohlbe
Post number 5000...
to all! [Helmut]Complete thread:
- Rejection of passed data Shastris 2010-04-01 19:42
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Rejection of passed dataOhlbe 2010-04-02 11:55
Ing. Helmut Schütz