Manual re-integration [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-11-19 16:35 (6426 d 12:34 ago) – Posting: # 2741
Views: 6,539

Dear Najat!

❝ ❝ That’s the reason one should always inspect all chromatograms and go with a manual integration if the automatic one obviously failed.


❝ Does this mean that all the chromatograms within a run should have the same integration mode (e.g. base to base) and if any chromatograms were integrated with a different mode (e.g. valley) within the same run they should be manually re-integrated to the (base to base) mode?


No. The analyst should visually inspect all chromatograms. For a particular chromatogram the automatically changed integration mode may be ‘correct’; in such a case leave it as it is. Only if the automatic integration obviously failed (this may happen quite often in the lower signal range where a lot of noise is present) the analyst should set the baseline manually. Most analysts I know would simply draw the new baseline with the mouse, rather than change integration parameters a couple of times until the system comes up with a better integration (this would result in a lot of trial-and-error…). If you change the integration parameters for the entire batch, you would again have to inspect all chromatograms, and repeat this cycle maybe forever… :cool:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
112 visitors (0 registered, 112 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5