Internal Standard Variation [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-08-15 19:29 (6519 d 19:46 ago) – Posting: # 2193
Views: 16,669

Servus, ElMaestro!

❝ It never hurts to have a SOP.


Yeah!

❝ Oder was?


I don’ know either; nice suggestions of yours (BTW - for our non-German speaking friends: “Oder was?” means “Or what?”).

❝ OK: This would work if the IS response follows a unimodal trend. But might not work if the IS-response has one or more extrema.


Ha! Of course we even can start some kind of control-chart business, but what for? QCs should be spread within the batch; if the batch passes, so what? An IS protects against the need of exact volume control during sample preparation – if half of the volume is spilled in one step, the analyte/IS ratio should stay the same (OK, as Ohlbe already pointed out last year, problems may arise close to the LLOQ).
I must confess, that I don’t get the point of the IS response variation discussion. :ponder:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
151 visitors (0 registered, 151 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5