Dilution integrity [Bioanalytics]
Dear Bab.
According to common sense, if the method was validated for no dilution, 1:5 and 1:10 dilution it should be possible to go with 1:2 also. But: regulators want to see data, not common sense.
It casts a damning light on both the analytical performance and the QAU (why was the 1:2 dilution performed ouside the validated method?). I would go with a partial validation and
❝ In method validation dilution integrity experiment was established with
❝ 1/5 and 1/10 dilution. But in the study sample analysis samples were
❝ diluted with 1/2 dilution only.
According to common sense, if the method was validated for no dilution, 1:5 and 1:10 dilution it should be possible to go with 1:2 also. But: regulators want to see data, not common sense.
❝ Is it acceptable?
It casts a damning light on both the analytical performance and the QAU (why was the 1:2 dilution performed ouside the validated method?). I would go with a partial validation and
- report the non-adherence to the SOP as a protocol deviation in the analytical report, and
- present results of the revalidation supporting a claim that no influence on the study's outcome is likely.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Dilution integrity babu 2008-08-05 12:47
- Dilution integrityHelmut 2008-08-05 13:39
- Dilution integrity ElMaestro 2008-08-06 09:03
- Dilution integrityHelmut 2008-08-05 13:39
