recoveries more than 100% [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ladi – Thailand, 2018-09-04 05:51 (2455 d 02:52 ago) – Posting: # 19232
Views: 5,462

Hello Deepak and Ohlbe,

❝ The % recovery was 107.80%, 112.65% and 105.92% for the low quality control (LQC) and middle quality controls (MQC2 and MQC1), respectively. Whereas % recovery for higher quality control (HQC) was 98.25%.


My lab called the 'post-extraction' as 'un-extracted', I am guessing you also mean that?

I observed recovery 100-115% mostly with protein precipitation projects in our lab. My explanation to auditors was that the extracted samples are little bit more concentrated than the post-extracted samples because some protein is precipitated out in extracted samples. While in the post-extracted samples, the measured volume of supernatant from precipitated blank is use to make up a required concentration. Ususally for protein precipitation, recovery is almost 100%. So if extracted is more concentrated than it supposed to be (expected conc.), recovery may cross 100%. However, I normally see similar %recovery across all concentrations.

Regards,
Ladi

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes
that can be made in his subject,
and how to avoid them.    Werner Heisenberg

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5