Metabolite back conversion [Bioanalytics]
Dear Samar Sameh,
It is difficult to give precise comments without more knowledge of the chemistry of the metabolite and possible back-conversion. Even without disclosing the molecule, can you tell us what you are dealing with: acylglucuronide, N-oxide, lactone/acid...
OK, worst case scenario.
My first question would be: how pure is your metabolite reference standard, and are you sure it does not contain even trace amounts of the parent ? Even 0.1 % would be enough in your experimental conditions. Try and inject a pure solution at the same level of concentration used in your experiment. If there is no parent peak: that's not the explanation. If there is one: it does not mean that your reference is contaminated, it could be in-source back-conversion (in-source collision-induced dissociation is well described in the literature for metabolites such as glucuronides and N-oxide). The next steps will then depend on the chemistry of the metabolite. If in-source back-conversion could be the explanation: changing your ionisation conditions may solve the issue (e.g. if glucuronide, try and decrease the cone voltage/declustering potential/whatever it is called on the instrument you use).
If you don't have any parent peak in a pure solution of the metabolite: then you may indeed have a back-conversion issue. You will have to run a series of experiments to find out at which step, and how to prevent it. I would suggest to start with the last steps of sample preparation, and then move backwards. For instance, extract blank plasma, spike the extract with a pure solution of the metabolite (minimum volume), reconstitute as usual, and inject at different times to see if a parent peak gradually appears.
If your metabolite reference standard contains trace amounts of the parent: you will have to take it into consideration to calculate the nominal concentration of the parent in your samples.
It is difficult to give precise comments without more knowledge of the chemistry of the metabolite and possible back-conversion. Even without disclosing the molecule, can you tell us what you are dealing with: acylglucuronide, N-oxide, lactone/acid...
❝ what we do is to spike the LLOQ samples of the drug with the maximum expected concentration of the metabolite
OK, worst case scenario.
❝ every time we have a failed accuracy, I don't know if there is really a back conversion or if our procedure is misleading.
My first question would be: how pure is your metabolite reference standard, and are you sure it does not contain even trace amounts of the parent ? Even 0.1 % would be enough in your experimental conditions. Try and inject a pure solution at the same level of concentration used in your experiment. If there is no parent peak: that's not the explanation. If there is one: it does not mean that your reference is contaminated, it could be in-source back-conversion (in-source collision-induced dissociation is well described in the literature for metabolites such as glucuronides and N-oxide). The next steps will then depend on the chemistry of the metabolite. If in-source back-conversion could be the explanation: changing your ionisation conditions may solve the issue (e.g. if glucuronide, try and decrease the cone voltage/declustering potential/whatever it is called on the instrument you use).
If you don't have any parent peak in a pure solution of the metabolite: then you may indeed have a back-conversion issue. You will have to run a series of experiments to find out at which step, and how to prevent it. I would suggest to start with the last steps of sample preparation, and then move backwards. For instance, extract blank plasma, spike the extract with a pure solution of the metabolite (minimum volume), reconstitute as usual, and inject at different times to see if a parent peak gradually appears.
If your metabolite reference standard contains trace amounts of the parent: you will have to take it into consideration to calculate the nominal concentration of the parent in your samples.
—
Regards
Ohlbe
Regards
Ohlbe
Complete thread:
- Metabolite back conversion samar sameh 2017-07-16 07:47
- Metabolite back conversionOhlbe 2017-07-17 10:24
- Metabolite back conversion samar sameh 2017-07-18 13:29
- Metabolite back conversion Ohlbe 2017-07-18 16:29
- Metabolite back conversion samar sameh 2017-07-18 13:29
- Metabolite back conversionOhlbe 2017-07-17 10:24