Change in curve changed the ratio of Cmax [Bioanalytics]

posted by Compliance – India, 2015-03-23 16:29 (3718 d 04:01 ago) – Posting: # 14600
Views: 12,315

Dear Ohlbe,

❝ Was there any change in the method apart from the LLOQ ?


Yes. we also change the processing volume from 0.5 ml to 0.150 ml.

❝ Did you run ISR with both methods ? What was the outcome ?


yes, first set of ISR is run and found satisfactory. second set is about to run of repeat study. However ISR of initial analysis is pass comfortably with around 90% acceptance.

I would like to add one thing that, i had done comparison of Cmax data between originally run assay and repeat study and found there is a difference of around 8-10% (negative side) and the same is getting reflected in the Cmax ratio.

some of the subject which are not getting qualify with initial range i.e. 1-800 ng/ml is getting qualify with the revised range 0.250 -250 and in that one of the period of test is showing very less concentration and this is affecting the ratio.

Please note this is 4 way crossover study.

Regards,

Compliance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
54 visitors (0 registered, 54 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics.
I can assure you mine are still greater.    Albert Einstein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5