Reference standards [Bioanalytics]

posted by janmacek – Czech Republic, 2015-02-13 11:57 (3754 d 16:59 ago) – Posting: # 14413
Views: 12,890

Dear colleagues,

the Guideline on bioanalytical method validation states in chapter 4.1, Reference standards "Suitable reference standards, include certified standards such as compendial standards (EPCRS, ..." We have bought such a European Pharmacopoeia Certified Reference Standard (EPCRS) from EDQM, but we were very surprised that they 1) do not provide a certificate of analysis for these standards, 2) do not indicate their expiry date and 3) they even do not specifiy the content of the compound in the standard (in some cases). They only state "If a CRS has no assigned content, this should in no case be interpreted as if the content were 100 per cent."

This seems very funny to us - a reference standard with no declared content :-) . But, more seriously, we have to work with it. Of course, we all know that for bioequivalence studies with relative measurements the purity of the reference standard is not critical, but auditors usually have not the same opinion.

Have you any experience with these European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standards? If so, how did you solve the above problems?

Have a nice day.

Jan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Far better an approximate answer to the right question,
which is often vague, than an exact answer to the wrong question,
which can always be made precise.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5