Another story! [Bioanalytics]

posted by Emrah Soner Özdeş – Turkey, 2014-11-28 11:00 (3831 d 14:04 ago) – Posting: # 13944
Views: 13,885

Hi Helmut;

I would like to thank you for all your help on the subject.

My guess is that the lab decided to renalayse the sample because of the "0.00" post dosing concentration. All other values are expressed BLOQ instead of "0.00" which makes me think that they really did a mistake in sample processing. (blank injection maybe). So they reanalysed the sample.

If this is the scenario, avarage of the reanalyses which was "2.39" should be the reported value, i guess.

I will question the lab with regard to those points.

Thanks again

Regards

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Far better an approximate answer to the right question,
which is often vague, than an exact answer to the wrong question,
which can always be made precise.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5