Handling "Not Reportable" Data [Bioanalytics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-11-21 10:53 (3840 d 13:53 ago) – Posting: # 13903
Views: 14,564

Hi Emrah,

❝ I think neglecting that value in PK analysis will be the best practice as ElMaestro advised.


Careful, please. If you are submitting in a territory where outlier detection is the norm then perhaps you can neglect the original value after some number crunching gymnastics. But if you are not submitting in a territory where outliers testing is popular then you would perhaps need to either report the value however wrong it sounds, or, audit and self-inspect the study to see if you can verify that something really went wrong (and you need more than just an unexpected value for that); a verification of a problem would then allow you to report the re-analysed value.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
59 visitors (0 registered, 59 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics.
I can assure you mine are still greater.    Albert Einstein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5