Numbers should reflect the precision of the instrumentation [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-09-28 21:34 (3892 d 09:11 ago) – Posting: # 13607
Views: 12,601

Hi everyone,

just discovered a goodie in the “Instructions for Authors” of The AAPS Journal and AAPS PharmSciTech:

Numbers should be reported to reflect the precision of the instrumentation utilized. Calculated numbers, such as means and standard deviations, should be expressed to no more than 1 sig­ni­fi­cant digit beyond the precision of the instrument. Normally, data reported to more than 3 significant figures should be justified. The precision of the variability (e.g., standard deviation) should not exceed that of the reported mean value.


I like that very much!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Far better an approximate answer to the right question,
which is often vague, than an exact answer to the wrong question,
which can always be made precise.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5