SAS vs. PHX/WNL [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-09-28 19:21 (3894 d 01:11 ago) – Posting: # 13606
Views: 12,769

Hi to all,

❝ This could be the case if there is one or more subjects having some period data missing; didn't I read somewhere that WNL will do a max likelihood optimisation by default (=essentially a mixed model) whereas SAS will try Proc GLM (normal linear model).

❝ The mixed model versus normal linear model would explain the subtle difference which then isn't a matter of decimals carried.


Correct for WinNonlin. SAS doesn’t try “Proc GLM” – it will use it if stated in the code (actually what John did). If we have incomplete data (period missing) we should get identical results if all data are kept:If incompleted cases are excluded (as sugested by the EMA for nonreplicated studies), any software / model should give the same results anyway. See also there.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
60 visitors (0 registered, 60 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics.
I can assure you mine are still greater.    Albert Einstein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5