Reporting of plasma concentration data etc [Bioanalytics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-09-28 17:07 (4283 d 00:00 ago) – Posting: # 13605
Views: 14,491

Hi both,

❝ ❝ 2) Lets say you analyze the data with 1) SAS, 2) Winnolin. The SAS result shows a 90% CI of 85.22 - 125.1 and the Winnonlin result shows 85.15 - 124.98????


❝ Are you sure the differences are due to decimal places - I would think it more likely there is some difference in your model settings to explain this - (although of course it's a great advert if WNL can somehow make borderline products BE ;0)


This could be the case if there is one or more subjects having some period data missing; didn't I read somewhere that WNL will do a max likelihood optimisation by default (=essentially a mixed model) whereas SAS will try Proc GLM (normal linear model).
The mixed model versus normal linear model would explain the subtle difference which then isn't a matter of decimals carried.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
164 visitors (0 registered, 164 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5