Non-weighting to weighting method [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ken Peh – Malaysia, 2014-08-19 21:33 (3933 d 23:54 ago) – Posting: # 13407
Views: 7,192

Dear Helmut,

❝ In your posts you regularly use the phrase “We were told…” It would help to know who told you some­thing. A colleague, a regulator/inspector, the sponsor?


Inspector. The inspector of the recent inspection is kind enough to accept the use of weighting factor in BE study.

❝ Correct – not only allowed, but mandatory in most cases. Do you remember this thread?


Yes. I remember. I learned a lot from the thread and have started using weighting factor after that.

❝ You have to stick to what you stated in the protocol. You can recalculate samples as an additional analysis. No idea how regulators like that. In the future, go for a weighted calibration.


The protocol you refer to is study protocol or method validation protocol? :confused: We do not explain in detail the analytical method in the study protocol, which is submitted to ethical committee.

❝ No. You could use the raw data of the MV and update the validation/SOP.


Kindly explain "update the validation".

Thank you for your kind sharing.

Regards,
Ken

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
54 visitors (0 registered, 54 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics.
I can assure you mine are still greater.    Albert Einstein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5