~geometric mean of range [Bioanalytics]

posted by nobody – 2014-06-17 20:26 (4388 d 14:57 ago) – Posting: # 13077
Views: 16,203

That’s a huge difference.


But not all differences (even if significant) matter :-D

The middle is, as the name says, somewhere in the middle. Anything else is for maltreating people...

And the weighing is applied for heteroscedasticy, coming close to LLOQ CV increases, never seen anything else in real live :-p and weighing increases accuracy of samples calculated from the calibration function, especially in the lower range. So, where am I wrong? :-)

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
108 visitors (0 registered, 108 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5