Acceptance of standard curve and re­analyzed samples [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ken Peh – Malaysia, 2014-04-01 20:36 (4470 d 20:25 ago) – Posting: # 12752
Views: 7,669

Dear Ohlbe,

❝ It depends what the reason was to reanalyse the sample. Analytical reason : if you consider the first value to be unreliable, pick the repeat value, even if close to the initial value. For PK repeats or confirmation of weird data (not to be done for EU submissions): you can keep the initial concentration if confirmed by the second.


Do we need to inject the third time if the repeat value and the initial value are far apart ? I have seen some CROs inject the third time to confirm whether the repeat or the initial value should be picked. How far the difference in value between repeat and initial value to justify for the third injection ?

❝ In any case the decision tree should be well defined in your SOP, or you could be accused of cherry picking.


How detail we should write in our SOP ? Besides SOP, can we define in in-house guideline ?

Appreciate your comments.

Thank you.

Regards,
Ken

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
355 visitors (0 registered, 355 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5