Recovery [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2014-03-23 17:37 (4081 d 12:12 ago) – Posting: # 12691
Views: 5,563

Dear Ken,

❝ Do you mean instead of using drug solution, we should compare with sample spiked post-extraction. Kindly elaborate.


Yes. Actually you can easily combine matrix effects and recovery experiments:
- extract spiked samples in 6 different lots of matrix
- spike the same 6 lots of matrix post-extraction, at the same level of concentration
- prepare neat solutions, at the same level of concentration
- inject all these samples
- compare the response in spiked samples to samples spiked post extraction: recovery
- compare the response to samples spiked post-extraction to neat solutions: matrix factor
- if you compare the response in spiked samples to neat solution: what you see is a kind of overall efficiency, which takes into consideration recovery + matrix effects.

❝ What about samples that do not go through extraction step ? Plasma samples treated with just the addition of ACN or methanol before injecting into LCMSMS.


I agree with Nobody: part of your analyte and IS can get trapped in the precipitate and the recovery may not be 100 %. It depends on the precipitation reagent, the way it is added, how you mix the sample afterwards, etc.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Far better an approximate answer to the right question,
which is often vague, than an exact answer to the wrong question,
which can always be made precise.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5