Reporting QCs [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2007-08-31 12:46 (6877 d 13:11 ago) – Posting: # 1042
Views: 8,707

Dear Harish,

Also have a look at the report of the "Crystal City III" FDA/AAPS workshop, page E36, under "Analytical/validation reports should include", point 2.

QC data from validation runs that only failed to meet QC acceptance criteria with no assignable cause for failure should be included in the precision and accuracy estimation.

If you have to include data from failing runs, excluding some results from validated runs is really not an option... Or at least have two versions of the tables in the validation report, one with and one without the failing results, as suggested.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
200 visitors (0 registered, 200 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5