Reporting QCs [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2007-08-30 14:05 (6872 d 04:10 ago) – Posting: # 1041
Views: 8,846

Dear Harish!

❝ Let's first assume that we are not performing any outlier test.


Good idea - would be possible for n>6 anyway, which in validation generally is performed only for LLOQ-samples.

❝ During Bioanalytical Method Validation, do we need to include the failed

❝ QCs in the Inter & Intra batch summary table for Mean & CV%

❝ calculations?


Yes, you should include all measured values in the report (your method's specifications should be transparent).
Excluded values should be flagged (i.e., by means of an asterisk leading to a footnote, or striken through).
I would suggest to present two tables for Accuracy/Precision; one with and the other one without excluded values - making the life of auditors and regulatory inspectors less miserable.

See also this thread.

P.S. I changed your user name from capitals only to mixed-case.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
139 visitors (0 registered, 139 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5