Difference in values between reanalysed and ISR samples [Bioanalytics]

posted by cakhatri – India, 2013-03-12 06:24 (4461 d 03:03 ago) – Posting: # 10189
Views: 4,199

Dear ohlbe,

Pl read my response in blue

❝ - in how many runs were the samples of these 3 subjects analysed initially ? How many runs for re-analysis ?


Each subject(three period) was analysed against a calibration curve and similarly for the repeat subjects

❝ - was the difference always in the same direction for all samples for each subject ? If yes, it just looks like an accuracy issue (one run may be 15 % too high, the second 15 % too low).


Yes, it was either -25 to -30% or + 25-30%

❝ - was the difference in the same direction for the 3 subjects ? Higher, or lower than the initial result ? If the difference was systematically in the same direction, with 3 independent runs, you may have an issue with stability (either of the parent analyte, or of a metabolite). Did you analyse your ISR runs only at the end of the study, or on an ongoing basis each time you had enough samples to re-analyse in a run ?


The difference was consistently on higher for two repeat subjects and lower for the other. ISR was performed at the end of the study.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
63 visitors (0 registered, 63 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s difficult to work in a group
when you are omnipotent.    John de Lancie (as Q)

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5