Diagnostics [Bioanalytics]
Dear drgopal,
In addition to Helmut's response: if you were to adopt such a system you would need to discuss the extended range on a parameter-by parameter basis, not just extend everything by 10 %. This would be OK for e.g. SGOT - 44 IU/l instead of 40 is no big deal, if the elevation is isolated. But take sodium, with normal ranges of 135-145 mmol/l. Extending the range to 122-159 would definitively not be acceptable ! And once again you can't interpret each parameter separately, you also have to look at the complete picture. And this is the investigator's job, not an SOP's.
Regards
Ohlbe
❝ Can we have a separate acceptable range on our own (+/- 10-15% of the range) as our company's range beside the reference range?
In addition to Helmut's response: if you were to adopt such a system you would need to discuss the extended range on a parameter-by parameter basis, not just extend everything by 10 %. This would be OK for e.g. SGOT - 44 IU/l instead of 40 is no big deal, if the elevation is isolated. But take sodium, with normal ranges of 135-145 mmol/l. Extending the range to 122-159 would definitively not be acceptable ! And once again you can't interpret each parameter separately, you also have to look at the complete picture. And this is the investigator's job, not an SOP's.
Regards
Ohlbe
Complete thread:
- Diagnostics drgopal 2007-08-18 08:22
- Reference ranges Helmut 2007-08-18 15:05
- DiagnosticsOhlbe 2007-08-21 19:18
- Diagnostics drgopal 2007-08-25 08:58
- Diagnostics Ohlbe 2007-08-27 00:16
- Diagnostics drgopal 2007-08-27 11:25
- Qualification of staff Ohlbe 2007-08-27 12:33
- Diagnostics drgopal 2007-08-27 11:25
- Diagnostics Ohlbe 2007-08-27 00:16
- Diagnostics drgopal 2007-08-25 08:58
