Scaling approach in steady state [Design Issues]
Dear AB,
Why not?
Not sure what you mean by “parameters to consider for the scaling”.
❝ Can we adopt a ref scaling approach in a steady state design for highly variable drugs?
Why not?
❝ if yes, in such cases what are the parameters to consider for the scaling for USFDA & EMA submission studies.
Not sure what you mean by “parameters to consider for the scaling”.
- PK metrics in steady state are AUCτ and Cmax,ss.
- FDA: RSABE acceptable for AUC and/or Cmax if sWR ≥0.294.
GMR within 0.8–1.25. Minimum sample size 24 (rumor!).
- EMA: ABEL acceptable only for Cmax if CVWR >30%; maximum scaling factor limited to 50%.
GMR within 0.8–1.25. Clinical justification required.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Scaling approach in steady state AB 2013-01-10 08:42
- Scaling approach in steady stateHelmut 2013-01-10 13:30
- Scaling approach in steady state AB 2013-01-11 13:42
- Only AUCt and Cmin Helmut 2013-01-11 14:11
- Scaling approach in steady state AB 2013-01-11 13:42
- Scaling approach in steady stateHelmut 2013-01-10 13:30
