FDA & multiplicity [Design Issues]
Hi John,
I’m less concerned with the common variance, but with multiplicity. If you are performing three simultaneous tests at 0.05 the combined risk will be 1 – (1 – 0.05)3 = 0.1426.
Bonferroni (well, this is the most conservative one) would require 1 – 2 × 0.05/3 = 96.67% CIs in order to keep the overall risk <0.05: 1 – (1 – 0.05/3)3 = 0.0492.
I’m less concerned with the common variance, but with multiplicity. If you are performing three simultaneous tests at 0.05 the combined risk will be 1 – (1 – 0.05)3 = 0.1426.
❝ […] But in our case it is not an issue because we nailed the 90% CIs.
Bonferroni (well, this is the most conservative one) would require 1 – 2 × 0.05/3 = 96.67% CIs in order to keep the overall risk <0.05: 1 – (1 – 0.05/3)3 = 0.0492.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Two Tests with Same Reference Noha Abdeljawad 2012-11-27 08:18
- Crossover designs with more than 2 treatments d_labes 2012-11-27 09:51
- Crossover designs with more than 2 treatments Noha Abdeljawad 2012-11-29 07:43
- Sounds wrong to me ElMaestro 2012-11-27 12:10
- Sounds wrong to me Dr_Dan 2012-11-27 14:32
- Sounds wrong to me Noha Abdeljawad 2012-11-29 07:52
- Two Tests with Same Reference jag009 2012-11-28 21:26
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-11-30 14:04
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-11-30 15:16
- FDA & multiplicityHelmut 2012-11-30 16:12
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-11-30 22:47
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-12-01 02:00
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-12-03 21:53
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-12-01 02:00
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-11-30 22:47
- FDA & multiplicityHelmut 2012-11-30 16:12
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings ElMaestro 2012-11-30 15:24
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings Helmut 2012-11-30 15:52
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings martin 2012-12-03 09:24
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings kumarnaidu 2013-12-12 11:03
- More infos, please Helmut 2013-12-12 15:27
- Multiplicity: Mixed feelings Helmut 2012-11-30 15:52
- FDA & multiplicity jag009 2012-11-30 15:16
- Two Tests with Same Reference Noha Abdeljawad 2012-12-03 08:29
- Two Tests with Same Reference jag009 2012-12-03 15:35
- X-way d_labes 2012-12-04 09:25
- design kvgreddy06 2013-12-19 15:32
- design kvgreddy06 2013-12-30 16:48
- design intuitivepharma 2013-12-31 06:44
- design kumarnaidu 2013-12-31 08:24
- Problematic design Helmut 2013-12-31 15:02
- Problematic design kvgreddy06 2014-01-03 14:46
- Problematic design kumarnaidu 2014-12-24 12:56
- Problematic design Helmut 2014-12-24 16:10
- Problematic design kumarnaidu 2014-12-26 05:38
- Two fully replicated designs? Helmut 2014-12-27 15:52
- Problematic design kumarnaidu 2014-12-26 05:38
- Problematic design Helmut 2014-12-24 16:10
- Problematic design Helmut 2013-12-31 15:02
- design kumarnaidu 2013-12-31 08:24
- design intuitivepharma 2013-12-31 06:44
- design kvgreddy06 2013-12-30 16:48
- design kvgreddy06 2013-12-19 15:32
- X-way d_labes 2012-12-04 09:25
- Two Tests with Same Reference jag009 2012-12-03 15:35
- FDA & multiplicity Helmut 2012-11-30 14:04
- Crossover designs with more than 2 treatments d_labes 2012-11-27 09:51
