Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Frequentists vs. Bayesians

Frequentists vs. Bayesians [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2012-11-18 15:48 (4962 d 17:11 ago) – Posting: # 9545
Views: 6,573

Dear Ben!

❝ […] results are more reliable in the sense that you know a priori all comparisons will behave equally.

[image]

:-D

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Replicated cross over with fixed number of periods martin 2012-11-05 17:31
- Additional information martin 2012-11-06 11:50
  - Quick Q for my clarification ElMaestro 2012-11-06 12:09
    - Quick Q for my clarification martin 2012-11-06 12:29
      - 5 periods ElMaestro 2012-11-06 12:43
      - Latin Squares ↔ Williams’ designs Helmut 2012-11-06 14:07
        
        Latin Squares ↔ Williams’ designs Ben 2012-11-07 21:10
        
        Williams’ designs more reliable? d_labes 2012-11-08 08:29
        
        Williams’ designs more reliable? Ben 2012-11-09 18:20
        
        Williams’ designs more reliable? d_labes 2012-11-11 14:14
        
        Williams’ designs more reliable? Ben 2012-11-18 13:20
        
        Frequentists vs. BayesiansHelmut 2012-11-18 14:48
        
        Frequentists vs. Bayesians Ben 2012-11-18 15:28

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
124 visitors (0 registered, 124 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic. Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz