Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Latin Squares ↔ Williams’ designs [Design Issues]

posted by Ben – Germany, 2012-11-07 22:10 (4982 d 00:08 ago) – Posting: # 9521
Views: 7,162

❝ I have learned from Detlew that Latin Squares should do as well.

That sounds interesting to me Would fit to this post... Detlew mentioned that the advantage of first order carry over can only be an advantage if effect of carry over is part of the model. But due to the design isn't it the case that a Williams design will give more reliable results in any case - even without adjusting for carry over in the model?

-Ben

Complete thread:

• Replicated cross over with fixed number of periods martin 2012-11-05 17:31 
  • Additional information martin 2012-11-06 11:50
    • Quick Q for my clarification ElMaestro 2012-11-06 12:09
      • Quick Q for my clarification martin 2012-11-06 12:29
        • 5 periods ElMaestro 2012-11-06 12:43
        • Latin Squares ↔ Williams’ designs Helmut 2012-11-06 14:07
          • Latin Squares ↔ Williams’ designsBen 2012-11-07 21:10
            • Williams’ designs more reliable? d_labes 2012-11-08 08:29
              • Williams’ designs more reliable? Ben 2012-11-09 18:20
                • Williams’ designs more reliable? d_labes 2012-11-11 14:14
                  • Williams’ designs more reliable? Ben 2012-11-18 13:20
                    • Frequentists vs. Bayesians Helmut 2012-11-18 14:48
                      • Frequentists vs. Bayesians Ben 2012-11-18 15:28