Blinding and unblinding [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-06-29 16:28 (5109 d 00:07 ago) – Posting: # 8874
Views: 5,988

Hi Constantinos!

❝ Who should be the person responsible for performing the randomization and blinding during a BE? I guess not someone directly involved in the clinical or analytical part of the study.


Ideally the sponsor.

❝ Could this person be the Principal Investigator?


Yes – although I would not call the PI “not […] directly involved in the clinical […] part of the study”. :-D
Regardless BE studies generally are open label, some regulators prefer the AE-monitoring performed blinded for treatment. If you don’t have ‘spare’ sub-investigators this requirement is difficult to fulfill.

In the CRO I was with we had a system where the PI wrote the protocol based on macro-assisted templates; the randomization, printing of tear-off labels of the IPs, bar-coded sample labels, and mapping of the entire study in a LIMS was performed in the background. Was quite a job to validate this stuff and pass GLP-certification and GMP/GCP-inspections. Wouldn’t recommend it to anybody lacking a lot of stamina.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
122 visitors (0 registered, 122 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5